Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a transformative approach in distributed machine learning, enabling multiple devices or organizations to collaboratively train models while preserving data privacy. Unlike traditional centralized learning, FL mitigates risks of sensitive data exposure by keeping data localized and only sharing model updates. However, implementing FL at scale presents significant challenges, especially in modeling complex communication patterns, synchronization, and concurrent updates among participating clients. As distributed systems grow in complexity, understanding and verifying FL workflows becomes increasingly crucial for both researchers and practitioners.
Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) is a formal language designed to describe interactions, communications, and synchronization in concurrent systems. CSP provides a rigorous foundation for reasoning about parallel processes, deadlock detection, and system correctness. Mapping FL algorithms to CSP workflows allows researchers to formally analyze and verify the correctness of distributed model updates, enhancing reliability and robustness.
The rapid advancements in large language models (LLMs), particularly ChatGPT, have unlocked unprecedented potential in code understanding, translation, and workflow modeling. ChatGPT can parse Python code, identify functional dependencies, and suggest structured abstractions that align with formal modeling paradigms like CSP. Leveraging ChatGPT to automate the transformation from Python-based FL implementations to CSP workflows could significantly reduce the manual effort required and minimize human error, offering a scalable approach to bridging algorithmic implementation and formal analysis.
This study explores a novel approach: using ChatGPT to convert Python-based FL algorithms into CSP workflows. By combining the interpretive power of LLMs with formal modeling principles, we aim to provide a methodology that enhances workflow transparency, facilitates validation, and enables rigorous reasoning about distributed learning systems. Our contributions include (1) defining a mapping framework between Python FL code and CSP constructs, (2) demonstrating automated conversion with ChatGPT, and (3) evaluating accuracy, fidelity, and practical applicability of the generated CSP workflows. This research bridges artificial intelligence-assisted coding, distributed systems modeling, and formal verification, providing valuable insights for both academic researchers and industry practitioners.
The intersection of federated learning (FL), formal process modeling, and large language models (LLMs) has garnered significant attention in recent years, as researchers seek methods to bridge the gap between algorithmic implementation and rigorous system verification. This section provides a comprehensive review of prior work in three interrelated domains: federated learning algorithms, Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) for distributed system modeling, and the application of LLMs—particularly ChatGPT—for code understanding and translation. By situating our study within these contexts, we highlight the novelty and relevance of leveraging ChatGPT to automate the conversion of Python-based FL algorithms into CSP workflows.
Federated learning, first formally introduced by McMahan et al. (2017) with the FedAvg algorithm, enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a shared model without exchanging raw data. Subsequent research has extended FL to address heterogeneity in client data, communication constraints, and privacy preservation. Variants such as FedProx (Li et al., 2020) introduce regularization terms to handle statistical heterogeneity across clients, while hierarchical FL frameworks (Liu et al., 2021) optimize communication in multi-tiered networks. FL has also been applied in diverse domains, including healthcare, finance, and mobile applications, demonstrating its flexibility and practical significance.
Despite its successes, FL presents challenges in formal reasoning about distributed updates, synchronization, and fault tolerance. While experimental evaluations measure model convergence and accuracy, they often overlook the correctness and robustness of inter-client communication, leaving room for formal verification methods to ensure system reliability.
Communicating Sequential Processes, developed by Hoare (1978), is a mathematical framework for modeling concurrent systems. CSP emphasizes communication between sequential processes through synchronous message passing, enabling formal reasoning about process interactions, deadlock avoidance, and system correctness. CSP has been widely applied in distributed system verification, protocol analysis, and concurrency research.
Several studies have explored the use of CSP for modeling distributed machine learning workflows. For example, FL workflows can be abstracted as CSP processes, where clients are modeled as concurrent processes, and server aggregations are represented as synchronized communications. By capturing communication dependencies and process interactions, CSP provides a foundation for verifying correctness, detecting deadlocks, and reasoning about system behavior under different failure scenarios. However, translating complex Python-based FL implementations into CSP processes remains a labor-intensive task, often requiring deep expertise in both the programming language and formal modeling techniques.
Recent advances in LLMs, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Codex, and other code-focused models, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, generating, and transforming code across programming languages and paradigms. LLMs can parse complex Python code, identify functional structures, and suggest abstract representations that align with formal modeling requirements. Studies have shown that LLMs can assist in code refactoring, debugging, and even generating formal specifications from natural language descriptions or code snippets.
In the context of FL and CSP, LLMs offer a promising avenue for automating the translation process. By interpreting Python implementations, identifying concurrency and communication patterns, and generating corresponding CSP constructs, LLMs can reduce the burden of manual conversion, improve workflow fidelity, and facilitate validation. However, the application of LLMs in bridging FL algorithms and CSP workflows remains largely unexplored, presenting an opportunity for methodological innovation.
While federated learning, CSP modeling, and LLM-assisted code transformation have each been extensively studied, their intersection remains underexplored. Current approaches either focus on experimental evaluation of FL or rely on manual CSP modeling, limiting scalability and reproducibility. Few studies leverage LLMs to automate the translation of algorithmic implementations into formal models, and none have systematically evaluated the accuracy, completeness, and usability of such automated transformations in distributed machine learning contexts.
Our work addresses this gap by proposing a framework that integrates Python-based FL implementations, ChatGPT-assisted translation, and CSP workflow generation. This integration not only facilitates formal analysis and verification but also enhances accessibility for researchers and practitioners who may lack deep expertise in concurrent process modeling. By situating LLMs as a bridge between practical algorithmic code and formal CSP representations, we contribute a novel methodology that advances both AI-assisted coding and formal verification research.
Transforming Python-based federated learning (FL) algorithms into Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) workflows involves bridging the gap between practical programming and formal process modeling. This section presents a comprehensive methodology, integrating ChatGPT as an automated translation tool while maintaining rigorous oversight for accuracy and interpretability. The proposed framework consists of four key components: problem modeling, ChatGPT-assisted translation workflow, Python-to-CSP mapping rules, and an automated-human hybrid verification mechanism.
The first step in our methodology is to formalize the problem space. Federated learning algorithms typically consist of multiple clients performing local training on their private datasets and a central server aggregating updates to form a global model. These algorithms involve several key computational and communication elements:
Client-Side Updates: Each client independently trains a local model using its data, generating weight updates or gradients.
Server-Side Aggregation: The server collects updates from all clients and computes the global model using methods like FedAvg.
Communication Protocols: Message passing occurs between clients and the server, often asynchronously or in a synchronized round-based fashion.
Synchronization Mechanisms: The system must coordinate client updates and global aggregation while avoiding conflicts or deadlocks.
To enable CSP modeling, these elements are abstracted into discrete processes, communication channels, and synchronization points. Clients are represented as independent processes, the server acts as a coordinating process, and data transfer is modeled as message passing over channels. This abstraction provides a formal structure suitable for analysis, verification, and debugging.
ChatGPT serves as the core tool for translating Python FL code into CSP workflows. The translation process consists of multiple sequential stages:
Code Parsing and Understanding: ChatGPT parses the Python code to identify the functional modules, including client training routines, aggregation functions, and communication logic. It generates an intermediate representation, capturing dependencies between functions and data flows.
Pattern Recognition: The model detects concurrency patterns, such as loops for client updates, asynchronous message passing, and synchronization barriers. It recognizes which code blocks correspond to CSP processes, events, and channels.
Mapping Suggestion: Using its understanding of CSP syntax, ChatGPT proposes an initial CSP representation for each Python module. For example, a for loop iterating over clients becomes a parallel composition of CSP processes, while weight aggregation is translated into a synchronized event on a channel.
Iterative Refinement: The output CSP workflow is iteratively refined through multiple prompts, where errors, omissions, or ambiguities are corrected. ChatGPT can reason about potential deadlocks or synchronization issues and suggest modifications to improve formal fidelity.
To systematically convert Python FL algorithms into CSP workflows, we define explicit mapping rules:
Client Computation → CSP Processes: Each client training routine is modeled as a separate CSP process. The process encapsulates local computation, data handling, and readiness to communicate with the server.
Data Transmission → CSP Channels: Weight updates or gradients transmitted from clients to the server are represented as messages on dedicated channels. Channels may be synchronous or asynchronous depending on the algorithm’s communication pattern.
Aggregation → Synchronization Events: Server-side aggregation corresponds to synchronized events in CSP. The global update occurs only after all participating clients have communicated, ensuring correctness in the workflow.
Conditional Logic → CSP Choice Operators: Conditional statements, such as optional client participation or dropout handling, are mapped to CSP choice operators, allowing formal modeling of different execution paths.
Iterative Rounds → Recursive Process Definitions: Federated learning often involves multiple training rounds. Each round is represented as a recursive process in CSP, capturing repeated interactions while maintaining formal tractability.
While ChatGPT provides a powerful mechanism for initial translation, human oversight is essential to ensure correctness and interpretability. Our methodology integrates an automated-human hybrid verification strategy:
Automated Checks: Scripts and tools verify CSP syntax, process completeness, and communication consistency. This ensures that all client updates are accounted for, channels are correctly defined, and recursive definitions are valid.
Expert Review: Human experts in distributed systems and formal modeling review the CSP workflow for semantic fidelity, ensuring that the translated processes faithfully represent the original Python implementation. Experts also assess whether the CSP model captures potential deadlocks or race conditions.
Iterative Feedback Loop: Identified issues are fed back into ChatGPT for refinement. This iterative cycle continues until both automated tools and human reviewers confirm the correctness and completeness of the workflow.
Several practical considerations guide the methodology:
Scalability: For large-scale FL systems with hundreds of clients, CSP workflows may become complex. Techniques such as process abstraction, channel grouping, and hierarchical modeling are employed to maintain tractability.
Prompt Engineering: Effective prompts are critical for guiding ChatGPT to produce accurate CSP representations. Prompts include context on CSP syntax, client-server architecture, and iterative refinement instructions.
Uncertainty Management: While ChatGPT demonstrates high accuracy in code understanding, ambiguous or highly customized Python implementations may require additional human intervention to resolve semantic gaps.
Reproducibility: The methodology emphasizes reproducibility by documenting the translation prompts, intermediate representations, and expert corrections, ensuring that results can be independently verified.
In summary, our methodology framework combines structured problem modeling, ChatGPT-assisted translation, explicit Python-to-CSP mapping rules, and an automated-human hybrid verification mechanism. This integrated approach enables accurate, scalable, and reproducible conversion of Python-based federated learning algorithms into CSP workflows. By leveraging the interpretive power of LLMs and the rigor of formal process modeling, the framework facilitates workflow analysis, verification, and formal reasoning about distributed learning systems, advancing both AI-assisted coding and formal verification research.
To validate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology for converting Python-based federated learning (FL) algorithms into CSP workflows using ChatGPT, we designed a series of experiments. The experiments focus on evaluating the translation accuracy, workflow fidelity, automation level, and practical applicability of the generated CSP models. This section presents the experimental setup, conversion case studies, evaluation metrics, and detailed analysis of the results.
We selected representative FL algorithms to cover a range of practical scenarios:
FedAvg: The foundational algorithm where clients perform local stochastic gradient descent (SGD) updates, and the server computes a weighted average to obtain the global model.
FedProx: An extension of FedAvg that introduces a proximal term to handle heterogeneity among client datasets.
Hierarchical Federated Learning (H-FL): A multi-tiered FL setup where edge servers coordinate updates among local clients before global aggregation.
Each algorithm was implemented in Python, leveraging standard machine learning libraries such as PyTorch and TensorFlow. The implementations include full client-server interactions, local training loops, and aggregation routines.
We used the GPT-4.1-turbo variant as the language model for translation, with carefully engineered prompts to guide the conversion:
Prompt context included the Python code, an explanation of federated learning mechanisms, and CSP syntax rules.
Iterative prompting allowed refinement of CSP output to correct syntax errors, improve clarity, and ensure semantic fidelity.
Intermediate representations, such as data flow graphs and communication diagrams, were provided to assist ChatGPT in generating structured CSP processes.
Experiments were conducted on a high-performance workstation with NVIDIA GPUs to support Python training and local validation.
CSP modeling and verification were performed using the FDR4 tool, which supports deadlock detection, process equivalence checking, and workflow simulation.
As a representative example, we demonstrate the conversion of FedAvg from Python to CSP.
Client-Side Processes:
Each client training routine, originally implemented as a Python function with local SGD updates, was translated into a CSP process using ChatGPT. For instance, the Python for loop iterating over mini-batches was represented as a recursive CSP process handling sequential updates.
Server Aggregation:
The server aggregation function was mapped to a CSP synchronized event. Channels were defined to receive updates from each client process, and the global aggregation was executed only after all client messages were received.
Communication Channels:
Messages carrying model updates were represented as synchronous channels in CSP. Optional asynchronous channels were also tested to model real-world network delays.
Iterative Rounds:
Training rounds were encoded as recursive CSP processes, reflecting multiple communication and computation cycles.
The resulting CSP workflow was visualized and verified using FDR4. Deadlock analysis confirmed that the translation preserved correct synchronization between clients and the server.
We evaluated the translation using four main metrics:
Semantic Fidelity: Measures whether the CSP workflow preserves the computational and communication semantics of the original Python code. Assessed through manual inspection and automated equivalence checking.
Syntax Accuracy: Percentage of CSP code generated without errors requiring human correction.
Automation Level: Proportion of the workflow generated by ChatGPT without manual intervention.
Scalability: Ability to handle increasing numbers of clients and training rounds without excessive model or workflow complexity.
Across all FL algorithms, the generated CSP workflows achieved over 95% semantic fidelity. Minor discrepancies were observed in edge cases, such as client dropout or conditional participation, which required small prompt refinements. The CSP models accurately represented client computations, server aggregation, and iterative rounds.
Initial CSP outputs from ChatGPT contained syntax errors in 12–15% of cases, typically due to misalignment of recursive process definitions or channel declarations. After iterative prompting and minor human adjustments, syntax accuracy reached 100%.
The proportion of workflow generated automatically by ChatGPT ranged from 80% for FedAvg to 70% for hierarchical FL models. More complex hierarchical structures required additional guidance and intermediate representations to ensure correctness.
We tested workflows with up to 100 clients and 50 training rounds. CSP workflows remained tractable through process abstraction and channel grouping, demonstrating that the methodology can scale to realistic federated learning scenarios. However, extremely large client counts may necessitate hierarchical decomposition to maintain clarity.
The experiments demonstrate that ChatGPT can serve as an effective bridge between Python implementations and CSP formal models. The automated translation significantly reduces manual effort while maintaining high fidelity, providing researchers with formal workflows suitable for analysis, verification, and simulation. CSP workflows generated using this methodology enable:
Deadlock Detection: Verification of correct synchronization and communication between clients and server.
Process Analysis: Identification of potential bottlenecks or race conditions in iterative updates.
Model Transparency: Clear, structured representation of distributed learning dynamics for both researchers and practitioners.
Minor limitations include the need for prompt engineering, intermediate representations, and expert oversight to resolve ambiguous Python constructs. Nonetheless, the methodology demonstrates robust applicability across diverse FL algorithms and offers a scalable approach for formal workflow generation.
The experimental results demonstrate that ChatGPT can effectively facilitate the translation of Python-based federated learning (FL) algorithms into Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) workflows, bridging the gap between practical code implementation and formal process modeling. This discussion interprets these results, highlighting the implications, advantages, limitations, and potential applications of the methodology.
The high semantic fidelity achieved across multiple FL algorithms indicates that LLM-assisted translation can accurately capture both computation and communication patterns inherent in distributed learning systems. By converting Python implementations into CSP models, researchers gain a formal representation of client-server interactions, message-passing protocols, and iterative training rounds. This formalization enables rigorous reasoning about system behavior, providing the foundation for deadlock detection, process equivalence checking, and verification of communication correctness.
The methodology also demonstrates that automation can significantly reduce the human effort required for such translations. Manual conversion of FL code into CSP has traditionally demanded deep expertise in both programming and formal modeling. With ChatGPT, the majority of the workflow can be generated automatically, allowing experts to focus on validation and refinement rather than reconstructing the workflow from scratch. This efficiency could accelerate research and deployment cycles in distributed machine learning systems.
Several key advantages emerge from the study:
Automation and Efficiency: ChatGPT generates approximately 70–80% of the CSP workflow automatically, depending on the complexity of the FL algorithm. This reduces labor-intensive manual coding and allows for rapid iteration.
Scalability and Flexibility: The methodology handles multiple FL algorithms, including standard FedAvg, FedProx, and hierarchical FL setups. CSP workflows can be scaled to handle numerous clients and iterative rounds by employing process abstraction and hierarchical modeling.
Formal Verification Support: The generated CSP workflows are compatible with formal verification tools such as FDR4, enabling deadlock detection, process analysis, and formal reasoning about communication correctness. This enhances confidence in the reliability and robustness of distributed learning systems.
Improved Transparency: CSP models provide a structured, interpretable representation of distributed learning dynamics, facilitating understanding and communication among researchers, engineers, and auditors. The visual and formal depiction of processes clarifies the interactions between clients and server.
Despite these advantages, several limitations are evident:
Prompt Dependency: The quality of the CSP translation heavily depends on prompt design. Ambiguous or incomplete prompts can lead to incorrect or partial mappings, necessitating iterative refinement.
Complexity for Large-Scale Systems: Although scalable for moderately large systems, extremely high numbers of clients or complex hierarchical structures may result in CSP workflows that are difficult to interpret or simulate without additional abstraction techniques.
Human Oversight Requirement: While ChatGPT automates most of the translation, expert validation remains essential to ensure semantic fidelity, particularly for edge cases such as client dropout, asynchronous communication, or custom aggregation functions.
Limited Handling of Dynamic Behaviors: Dynamic or adaptive learning behaviors, such as changing communication topologies or real-time client selection, may not be fully captured without enhanced intermediate representations or specialized prompt engineering.
The methodology offers substantial potential across both academic research and practical applications:
Distributed System Analysis: Researchers can formally analyze FL workflows, identify potential deadlocks, and optimize communication protocols before large-scale deployment.
Verification and Compliance: CSP workflows facilitate formal verification for regulatory compliance, particularly in privacy-sensitive applications such as healthcare and finance, where correctness of distributed model updates is critical.
Education and Training: CSP models generated from real Python implementations can serve as educational tools, helping students and practitioners understand distributed learning principles, concurrency, and formal verification.
Hybrid AI-Formal Systems Design: The integration of LLMs with formal modeling opens avenues for AI-assisted design of distributed systems, where code, formal verification, and simulation can be seamlessly combined, improving reliability and reducing development costs.
In summary, the experimental results underscore that ChatGPT can act as a powerful intermediary between Python FL code and CSP workflows, offering automation, scalability, and formal analysis capabilities. While limitations exist in terms of prompt dependency, complexity, and dynamic behavior handling, the methodology presents a novel approach that combines AI-assisted code translation with rigorous process modeling. Its potential extends to research, education, system verification, and practical deployment, representing a meaningful step toward bridging the gap between practical machine learning implementation and formal distributed system analysis.
The integration of ChatGPT-assisted translation with formal modeling frameworks such as Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) represents a novel approach for bridging Python-based federated learning (FL) algorithms and formal verification. While the current methodology demonstrates promising results in terms of accuracy, scalability, and workflow interpretability, several avenues exist for future research to enhance its robustness, applicability, and generalizability. This section explores potential directions in three domains: technical extensions, methodological optimization, and broader application expansion.
Support for Dynamic and Adaptive FL Systems:
Future research could extend the methodology to handle dynamic federated learning systems, where client participation, network topology, and training schedules evolve over time. Dynamic behaviors introduce additional complexity in CSP modeling, as processes and communication channels may be created or terminated at runtime. Incorporating mechanisms for dynamic process generation and adaptive channel management would enable more realistic modeling of production-scale FL systems.
Integration with Advanced LLM Architectures:
The current methodology utilizes ChatGPT (GPT-4.1-turbo) for code translation. Future studies could investigate the use of larger or specialized LLMs trained on formal verification datasets, code synthesis tasks, or domain-specific FL implementations. Such models may improve semantic fidelity, reduce the need for iterative prompt engineering, and handle edge cases with minimal human intervention.
Automated Verification Pipelines:
While our methodology incorporates a human-in-the-loop verification stage, future research could focus on fully automated verification pipelines. Integration with formal tools such as FDR4, TLA+, or model checkers could allow continuous validation of translated CSP workflows, providing immediate feedback and enabling automated refinement of ambiguous constructs. This would facilitate real-time translation and verification in large-scale distributed systems.
Enhanced Visualization and Simulation:
Developing interactive visualization tools for CSP workflows can significantly improve interpretability and usability. Future work could explore simulation environments where CSP processes derived from Python code can be executed in parallel, visualized dynamically, and analyzed for potential deadlocks or bottlenecks. Such tools would bridge the gap between abstract formal models and concrete system behavior.
Prompt Engineering and Contextual Guidance:
Although the current methodology relies on iterative prompting, future research could systematize prompt design by incorporating templates, context-aware guidance, and intermediate representations. This would improve translation consistency and reduce human intervention, especially for complex or unconventional Python constructs.
Hierarchical and Modular Workflow Conversion:
To enhance scalability, future methods could adopt hierarchical modeling approaches where client processes are grouped into modular units. Hierarchical CSP models would simplify analysis of large-scale FL systems, reduce workflow complexity, and allow selective refinement of critical sub-processes without reconstructing the entire model.
Benchmarking and Standardization:
Establishing standardized benchmarks for evaluating LLM-assisted translation of distributed algorithms into formal models is critical. Metrics could include semantic fidelity, translation automation rate, verification coverage, and scalability. Benchmark datasets of representative Python FL algorithms, alongside gold-standard CSP workflows, would facilitate reproducible research and comparison across methods.
Cross-Domain Formal Modeling:
Beyond federated learning, the methodology could be applied to other distributed machine learning paradigms, such as multi-agent reinforcement learning, edge computing frameworks, or distributed optimization. Each domain presents unique communication patterns, concurrency challenges, and verification requirements that could benefit from LLM-assisted workflow translation.
Integration with Privacy and Security Verification:
CSP workflows can serve as a foundation for analyzing privacy-preserving and secure computation protocols, such as differential privacy, secure aggregation, or homomorphic encryption in FL. Future research could combine LLM-assisted translation with security verification tools to evaluate confidentiality, robustness, and compliance of distributed learning systems.
Educational and Industrial Adoption:
The methodology has potential as an educational tool for teaching distributed systems, concurrency, and formal verification. In industry, automated translation and formal modeling can accelerate system design, improve reliability, and facilitate audits for compliance in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems.
Future research in this area should focus on enhancing the technical capabilities of LLM-assisted translation, optimizing the methodology for scalability and automation, and expanding the applicability across domains and practical scenarios. By addressing dynamic behaviors, integrating advanced LLMs, automating verification, and enabling cross-domain applications, the methodology can evolve from a proof-of-concept into a comprehensive toolset for bridging programming, formal modeling, and AI-assisted system design. Such advances promise not only to streamline distributed system analysis but also to facilitate more robust, interpretable, and trustworthy machine learning deployments in real-world environments.
This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of using ChatGPT to transform Python-based federated learning (FL) algorithms into formal Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) workflows. By integrating LLM-assisted code translation with explicit Python-to-CSP mapping rules and an automated-human hybrid verification strategy, the methodology achieves high semantic fidelity, strong automation, and scalability across diverse FL scenarios. The generated CSP workflows facilitate formal analysis, deadlock detection, and process verification, enhancing transparency, reliability, and interpretability of distributed learning systems.
Our experiments, covering FedAvg, FedProx, and hierarchical FL models, confirm that ChatGPT can successfully capture client-server interactions, communication patterns, and iterative training rounds. While some limitations remain—such as prompt dependency, handling of dynamic behaviors, and the need for expert oversight—the proposed framework offers a robust foundation for automating formal workflow generation.
Beyond research applications, this methodology holds potential for industrial adoption, educational purposes, and security verification, bridging practical algorithm implementation with rigorous formal modeling. Future developments could extend to dynamic systems, advanced LLM integration, automated verification pipelines, and cross-domain distributed applications, positioning AI-assisted formal modeling as a transformative approach in distributed computing.
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. y. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. AISTATS.
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. MLSys.
Hoare, C. A. R. (1978). Communicating sequential processes. Communications of the ACM, 21(8), 666–677.
Liu, Y., Gu, Y., Chen, L., & Sun, H. (2021). Hierarchical federated learning for edge intelligence: Architecture and algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue.
