In recent years, large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT have attracted global attention for their ability to generate human-like text and support diverse applications across education, research, and industry. Among these, physics education presents a particularly intriguing domain. Teachers and researchers frequently require large sets of isomorphic problems—problems that differ in context and expression but rely on the same underlying principle. Such problems are invaluable for probing whether students truly grasp concepts, or merely memorize specific solutions. However, crafting high-quality isomorphic problems is often time-consuming, inconsistent, and difficult to scale manually.
This paper introduces a novel methodology that integrates prompt chaining—a structured sequence of prompts that guides problem generation step by step—with tool augmentation, the use of external computational and symbolic tools to ensure correctness and reliability. Together, these approaches transform ChatGPT from a purely generative system into a semi-automated educational agent capable of producing pedagogically sound, verifiable, and adaptable isomorphic physics problems. The discussion is not only methodological but also addresses broader educational and societal implications, positioning AI as both a resource and a partner in reimagining the future of teaching, learning, and assessment.
In the context of physics education, the notion of isomorphic problems refers to problems that may appear different on the surface—employing varied contexts, storylines, or representational forms—but which fundamentally rely on the same underlying physical principles for their solution. For example, a problem involving a ball dropped from a tower and another involving a child sliding down a frictionless slide both call upon the principle of conservation of mechanical energy. Although the situations are dissimilar in narrative detail, the governing equations and conceptual reasoning remain identical.
The concept of isomorphism in problem design reflects a long-standing tradition in education: that learning is not merely the accumulation of surface-level information but rather the mastery of transferable principles. In physics, where laws are universal and context-independent, isomorphic problems provide an effective pedagogical tool for bridging the gap between abstract theory and concrete application.
One of the most persistent challenges in teaching physics is ensuring that students understand principles deeply enough to apply them flexibly. Many learners can reproduce solutions to problems they have previously studied but fail when confronted with a novel scenario that, while structurally equivalent, looks different. Isomorphic problems are designed to test whether a student has moved beyond rote memorization toward conceptual mastery.
This is crucial for several reasons:
Assessment of Transferable Knowledge: Transfer of learning—the ability to apply knowledge from one context to another—is a central goal of education. Isomorphic problems allow instructors to evaluate whether transfer has truly occurred.
Reinforcement of Abstraction: By repeatedly encountering the same principle across varied contexts, students are encouraged to focus on the invariant structure of the problem rather than its superficial details.
Development of Scientific Thinking: Physics education is not simply about learning equations but about learning to think like a physicist. Recognizing structural similarities among diverse problems is a hallmark of expert cognition.
Cognitive science research provides substantial support for the use of isomorphic problems. Studies in analogical reasoning show that novices often focus on surface features, whereas experts focus on deep structure. For instance, when given a problem about a military strategy involving converging forces and another about radiating beams of light in cancer treatment, novices fail to see the analogy, but experts immediately recognize the shared underlying principle.
Similarly, in physics, novices may view a “falling ball” problem and a “sliding skier” problem as unrelated because of contextual differences, whereas experts immediately identify them as isomorphic energy-conservation problems. Thus, isomorphic problems serve not only as instructional tools but also as diagnostic instruments, revealing the level of cognitive sophistication a learner has achieved.
Conceptual Mastery:
By presenting the same law in multiple disguises, isomorphic problems help ensure that students internalize the principle, rather than memorizing procedures.
Fairness and Inclusivity:
Different students relate to different contexts. A sports-related example may resonate with some learners, while others might better engage with problems rooted in daily life. Providing multiple isomorphic forms of the same principle ensures inclusivity and minimizes cultural or experiential bias.
Combatting Illusions of Understanding:
Students often overestimate their competence after solving a familiar problem type. When confronted with isomorphic variations, they must demonstrate genuine understanding rather than reliance on pattern recognition.
Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills:
The process of mapping different contexts onto the same abstract principle strengthens analogical reasoning and fosters flexibility in thinking, both of which are essential in advanced scientific inquiry.
Mechanics (Newton’s Second Law):
Scenario A: A car of mass mmm accelerates under the action of a constant engine force.
Scenario B: A rocket in space accelerates due to its exhaust thrust.
Scenario C: A child pulls a sled with constant force on level ground.
All three problems involve the relation F=maF = maF=ma.
Electricity (Ohm’s Law):
Scenario A: A current flows through a simple resistor.
Scenario B: A bulb lights up in a circuit.
Scenario C: A heating coil warms water.
All three contexts require V=IRV = IRV=IR.
Thermodynamics (First Law):
Scenario A: Heating an ideal gas at constant volume.
Scenario B: Compressing a gas with a piston.
Scenario C: Melting ice in a sealed container.
Each case involves the principle ΔU=Q−W\Delta U = Q - WΔU=Q−W.
These examples demonstrate how isomorphic problems can span not only diverse contexts but also multiple subfields of physics.
The deliberate use of isomorphic problems has roots in both educational psychology and physics pedagogy. Researchers such as Singh (2008) have shown that students who practice with isomorphic pairs are more likely to transfer concepts correctly to novel problems. Chi and colleagues (1994) emphasized that shifting students’ focus from “things” to “processes” is critical in overcoming misconceptions, and isomorphic problems serve as a practical way to achieve that shift.
Furthermore, problem-based learning frameworks have long argued for the use of varied yet structurally similar problems to build robust conceptual networks. In this sense, isomorphic problem sets are not merely assessment tools but also vehicles for deeper learning.
Despite their clear benefits, isomorphic problems are not easy to design manually. Teachers and examiners often face several obstacles:
Creativity and Consistency: Generating multiple contexts that are sufficiently distinct yet structurally equivalent requires both creativity and deep subject knowledge.
Time Intensity: Crafting reliable isomorphic pairs or sets can take hours of preparation, which is impractical at scale.
Risk of Unintended Differences: Even small contextual changes can inadvertently introduce additional variables or constraints, undermining the intended isomorphism.
Lack of Diversity: Human-designed examples may reflect the biases and limited experiences of their creators, reducing the breadth of contexts offered to students.
These challenges underscore the potential value of AI-assisted generation, where systems like ChatGPT can be guided through structured prompts and external verification tools to produce isomorphic problems more efficiently and consistently.
The importance of isomorphic problems extends beyond physics or even science education. In a world where knowledge must be adaptable across domains, the ability to see through surface differences to underlying principles is increasingly vital. Whether in engineering, computer science, or even social sciences, the skill of recognizing structural similarities across contexts lies at the heart of critical thinking and innovation.
Thus, while the present study focuses on physics, the broader pedagogical message is clear: isomorphic problem design is a gateway to nurturing transferable reasoning skills, ensuring that students are not simply “trained” to solve familiar problems but educated to think flexibly and creatively in novel situations.
In summary, isomorphic problems are far more than pedagogical curiosities. They are powerful tools for fostering conceptual understanding, inclusivity, fairness, and transferable problem-solving skills. Their importance is validated by decades of cognitive and educational research, and their potential impact reaches far beyond physics classrooms. Yet, the practical challenges of creating them at scale have limited their broader adoption. This tension between pedagogical importance and practical difficulty motivates the search for innovative solutions, such as those explored in this paper—using ChatGPT with prompt chaining and tool augmentation to reliably generate isomorphic problems for modern education.
The academic value of employing ChatGPT with prompt chaining and tool augmentation for generating isomorphic physics problems extends well beyond practical classroom applications. At the research level, this methodology contributes to the broader discourse on automatic problem generation (APG)—a field that intersects computational linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education technology. Traditional APG systems often rely on fixed templates or handcrafted ontologies, which limit their scalability and adaptability. By contrast, ChatGPT’s large-scale pretrained language model can capture nuanced relationships between problem contexts, making it possible to generate isomorphic problems that are both linguistically diverse and conceptually accurate.
This shift not only enhances the breadth of datasets available for physics education research but also enables empirical studies on how variations in problem surface features influence student comprehension. For example, large-scale controlled experiments can be conducted using automatically generated isomorphic problems to investigate transfer of learning, error patterns, and conceptual resilience. In this way, the methodology serves as a research enabler, offering scholars new empirical tools for probing fundamental questions in cognitive science and education.
From an educational standpoint, the ability to reliably generate isomorphic problems opens pathways for pedagogical innovations. Physics educators often emphasize the necessity of exposing students to multiple contexts in which the same principle applies, as this helps cultivate abstract thinking and problem-solving flexibility. However, manually constructing such problem sets is time-consuming and prone to bias.
By integrating ChatGPT-driven generation into curricula, instructors can instantly access a rich reservoir of problem variations, which allows for adaptive teaching strategies:
Personalized learning: Different students can receive problem sets tailored to their proficiency level, ensuring neither boredom from repetitive questions nor frustration from excessively difficult ones.
Formative assessment: Teachers can design real-time quizzes populated with automatically generated isomorphic problems, providing immediate feedback on conceptual mastery.
Active learning: Classroom activities such as group discussions, peer instruction, or gamified problem-solving can be enriched by a wide variety of problem contexts, all rooted in the same underlying principles.
This flexibility aligns well with modern educational paradigms, which increasingly stress personalization, interactivity, and competency-based evaluation.
Another significant educational implication lies in the realm of equity and accessibility. In many educational systems, disparities in instructional resources create unequal opportunities for students to encounter sufficient practice material. A system that can reliably generate high-quality isomorphic problems democratizes access to learning content, particularly in under-resourced regions.
Furthermore, when combined with multilingual support, the methodology can ensure that students from different linguistic backgrounds engage with equivalent problem structures in their native languages. This helps dismantle language barriers in STEM education, making scientific reasoning more inclusive. By extending access to culturally contextualized problem sets, ChatGPT-driven systems also support culturally responsive pedagogy, wherein learners can connect abstract physics concepts to familiar real-world settings.
The academic and educational contributions of this research are not isolated from broader theoretical frameworks. The capacity to generate isomorphic problems systematically bridges the gap between cognitive science theories of transfer and their classroom implementation. For decades, scholars have highlighted the difficulty students face in transferring knowledge across contexts. With reliable generation of isomorphic problems, researchers and educators can co-design instructional interventions explicitly aimed at enhancing transfer.
For instance, experimental designs can test hypotheses about how surface similarity versus structural similarity affects student reasoning. These findings, in turn, feed back into curriculum design, professional development for teachers, and even the fine-tuning of AI systems themselves. Thus, the methodology establishes a feedback loop between AI development, educational practice, and cognitive theory, reinforcing the interdisciplinary nature of this research.
Looking ahead, one of the most promising directions for the generation of isomorphic physics problems lies in the integration with adaptive learning platforms. Such systems continuously track student performance, identifying strengths and weaknesses in real time. By coupling these diagnostic capabilities with ChatGPT’s problem generation pipeline, it will be possible to create dynamic curricula that evolve with each student’s learning trajectory. For example, if a learner demonstrates difficulty in applying Newton’s Second Law in rotational contexts, the system can immediately generate targeted isomorphic problems to reinforce that specific conceptual gap.
This degree of personalization, scaled across classrooms and institutions, could transform the conventional “one-size-fits-all” educational model into a more fluid, learner-centered paradigm. The future of AI-enhanced education may thus resemble a collaborative co-pilot system, where human teachers provide guidance and interpretation while AI systems continuously supply pedagogical resources
Despite its strengths, one limitation of current large language models is the opacity of their reasoning process. For education, where transparency and trust are paramount, the future requires progress in explainable AI (XAI). This means not only generating isomorphic problems but also providing rationale annotations—explanations of why two problems are isomorphic, which principles connect them, and how surface differences do not alter underlying structures.
Such capabilities would enable students to not only practice but also internalize meta-cognitive strategies, understanding how to recognize the deep structure of problems themselves. Teachers, likewise, could use these AI-provided rationales to refine their pedagogy and to identify misconceptions in real time. Ultimately, embedding explainability into the problem generation pipeline ensures that AI systems support, rather than replace, critical thinking and conceptual clarity.
The future of problem generation will likely extend beyond textual problems to embrace multimodal content. Physics, by its very nature, often relies on diagrams, graphs, and experimental setups to convey relationships that text alone cannot fully capture. With advances in multimodal large language models capable of handling text, images, and equations, it will become feasible to automatically generate isomorphic problems accompanied by visual representations.
For instance, a problem describing an inclined plane in text could be paired with a dynamically generated diagram. Another problem addressing wave interference could include a simulated waveform plot. Such multimodal isomorphs not only enrich the learning experience but also better reflect the authentic practice of physics, where interpretation of multiple representations is a key skill.
As AI-driven systems become embedded in education, ethical and policy frameworks must keep pace. Key concerns include:
Bias and Fairness: Ensuring that generated problems do not inadvertently reinforce cultural stereotypes or exclude minority contexts.
Data Privacy: Protecting student learning data used to adaptively generate problem sets.
Teacher Agency: Avoiding over-reliance on AI that might marginalize human educators.
Addressing these challenges requires an interdisciplinary dialogue involving educators, technologists, policymakers, and ethicists. Future research should emphasize co-design approaches, where teachers actively participate in shaping AI tools, ensuring alignment with pedagogical goals and values.
Finally, the long-term vision extends toward the creation of a global learning commons, a shared repository of isomorphic problem sets generated and refined by AI systems in collaboration with educators worldwide. Such a commons would:
Enable cross-cultural exchange of teaching resources.
Reduce inequality by providing free access to high-quality practice material.
Foster a global research community that continuously evaluates and improves AI-driven educational tools.
In this vision, ChatGPT and its successors are not isolated tools but integral contributors to an ecosystem of collaborative knowledge-building. This aligns with broader goals of democratizing education and fostering scientific literacy across diverse populations.
The exploration of ChatGPT-driven generation of isomorphic physics problems, enhanced through prompt chaining and tool integration, represents a significant advancement at the intersection of artificial intelligence and education. By addressing both methodological challenges and practical applications, this approach strengthens our capacity to design scalable, adaptive, and inclusive learning environments.
From a research perspective, it opens new pathways for investigating the cognitive mechanisms of transfer and abstraction. From an educational perspective, it promises to empower teachers, support students, and democratize access to high-quality resources. Looking forward, the convergence of adaptive systems, explainability, multimodality, and ethical governance will be critical to realizing the full potential of AI-enhanced problem generation. Ultimately, the endeavor underscores a central principle: technology should not replace the human dimensions of teaching and learning but rather amplify them, creating richer opportunities for intellectual growth and equitable education worldwide.
Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. Worth Publishers.
Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Harvard University Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Academies Press.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Leveraging large language models for automatic problem generation in STEM education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 41(3), 215–232.
